Why is this important
The conflict reveals the sensitivity of the topic of corruption in the construction sector. The ministry’s official reaction sparks discussions about freedom of expression for entrepreneurs. The problem of transparency and real functioning of digital government services was raised.
What happened
- The Ministry of Construction stated that Abdusamatov’s words about bribery damaged the ministry’s honor and reputation.
- An official statement was submitted to the Ministry of Internal Affairs requesting the businessman’s prosecution.
- Abdusamatov himself said that during construction in Tashkent, he had to pay bribes of up to $200,000.
- He called for the introduction of liability for unjustified refusal of construction permits.
Context
The Ministry of Construction insists that all processes are carried out through the Single Interactive State Portal of Interactive Public Services and the “Transparent Construction” system. The Cadastre Agency clarified that it does not participate in issuing permits, but only registers objects.
Previously, the businessman complained about repeated refusals and “obstructions” in obtaining permits. The Ministry of Construction reminded that an official fee of 1 BCV per cubic meter of construction is provided in Tashkent.
